|||

The Meaning of Design

Ben @ Stratechery  writes eloquently about what design thinking is. It’s key to innovation and creating value to customers. All our work, whether policy formulation, Strategy, innovation starts from this.

Approaching a problem with a design thinking mindset, however, certainly takes into account what a customer says, but simply as one input among many. In this approach, observing the way people really live, developing a deep understanding of the real problems they have, and gaining an appreciation of the hacks” they devise to overcome them can deliver an understanding of prospective customers’ needs that is more accurate than what any of those prospective customers could ever articulate on their own.

And then, from that understanding, an entirely new, highly differentiated product can be delivered that surprises and delights.2 From a business perspective, the emotion and attachment said product inspires breaks down price sensitivity and builds brand attachment, and inspires the sort of viral marketing that can’t be bought.

The brands that resonate, that people love — most famously Apple, of course, but there are other examples3 — are those that suprise and delight. In fact, those words are a central tenet at Apple, and one of the primary standards by which all products are measured. What few appreciate, though, is that when Steve Jobs bragged about not doing market research or not holding focus groups, he was not saying Apple did less than the competition; rather, they did so much more.

It is this lack of understanding and appreciation for the very hard work and deep thinking required to surprise and delight that leads to countless companies and Steve-Jobs-wannabes crashing-and-burning, even as they declare their fealty to design. What they don’t understand is that design is not just about looking good, or working well, or even being easy-to-use. The most fundamental part of design is truly understanding your customers at a deeper level than they even understand themselves. Moreover, to truly be design-centric is harder than being market-centric. Things like surveys and focus groups persist because, while the products that result may not inspire love, they don’t inspire hate — or worse, apathy — either.

Up next Google’s People Problem Interesting commentary Om Malik on Google’s latest moonshot - Smart contact lenses for people with Diabetes. I cannot get over what seems to me a Why Design Thinking Won’t Save You (Or Any Other Discipline) Coming from a investment banking background, an MBA degree and a focus on social change, I easily saw the value of business thinking to create value
Latest posts Systems Thinking in Strategy Plurality of Strategic Frameworks Co-Design for Innovation Digital Connectivity and Mental Health Empathy and Imagination Geopolitics Drive Business Models Green Hydrogen Opportunity for Australia Kanyini, South Australia’s Very Own Satellite Taking Shape Mauboussin on Diversity Network Thinking and Design Thinking States of Change - Six Principles Sustainability Skills of the Future Synthetic Biology Untitled Document Best EVs Are Small EVs Because these surprise-generating AIs have learned their art from Fascinating: Adani Green the world leader in hybrid Digital Switzerland Catl After 5 Yrs Gulf and the Race for Renewables and Green Hydrogen Australia needs to change its skilled migration approach. Preston Model and Community Wealth Building More on Green Sustainability skills of the future from Microsoft captures the key Circular Economy Business Models Green Hydrogen Opportunity for Australia Network Thinking and Design Thinking Foresight and Design Tan Sri and Greater India entrepreneurship and greece